Tag: peer feedback
How to Change the Dynamics of Peer-to-peer Learning
Here’s what most educators and parents innately know as a truism of education:
“If you can’t explain something simply, you don’t understand it well enough.” –Albert Einstein
Peer-to-peer learning–acquiring knowledge from a peer group–has become a popular strategy as teachers move from a “teacher-lecturer” education model to “teacher-guide”. Often, it is a less stressful way to develop lifelong learners. As a pedagogical strategy, it can be effective in reinforcing critical thinking, cooperation, creativity, and problem solving–traits that are difficult to teach but essential for students who want to become productive, happy adults.
What is Peer-to-peer Learning
Peer-to-peer learning is where individuals learn from and with each other rather than relying on a traditional teacher or instructor. It involves collaboration, knowledge sharing, and mutual support among peers—typically people at a similar level of expertise or experience—working together to achieve a common learning goal. Participants exchange ideas, explain concepts, ask questions, and provide feedback. The process fosters critical thinking, communication skills, and a deeper understanding of the subject matter, as teaching others reinforces one’s own knowledge. Examples include study groups, coding boot camps where participants critique each other’s work, or online communities where users share expertise. It’s built on the idea that collective learning can be just as effective, if not more so, than top-down instruction, leveraging diverse perspectives and real-world problem-solving.
How is it implemented
The Roman philosopher Seneca declared: “docendo discimus” (“by teaching, we learn”). So how is it done?
- Define Clear Objectives
- Identify Participants
- Establish Ground Rules
- Pick a structure that fits the group’s needs:
-
Study Groups: Divide topics and teach each other.
-
Workshops: Rotate leadership for hands-on practice.
-
Discussion Circles: Analyze material together.
-
Project-Based: Collaborate on a tangible outcome (e.g., coding a program).
-
- Monitor Progress
- Encourage Feedback
- Evaluate and Adapt
Advantages
-
Enhanced Understanding: Explaining concepts to peers reinforces your own grasp of the material. Teaching forces you to clarify your thoughts, often revealing gaps in your knowledge.
-
Collaboration Skills: Working with others builds teamwork, communication, and interpersonal skills, which are valuable beyond academics.
-
Diverse Perspectives: Peers bring different viewpoints, experiences, and problem-solving approaches, enriching the learning process.
-
Increased Engagement: Learning feels more interactive and less hierarchical, boosting motivation and participation.
-
Flexibility: It can happen anywhere—classrooms, online platforms, or casual meetups—and adapt to learners’ schedules and needs.
Disadvantages
-
Uneven Knowledge Levels: If peers have significantly different skill levels, some may struggle to keep up while others feel held back.
-
Lack of Expert Guidance: Without a qualified instructor, misinformation can spread if no one catches errors.
-
Dependence on Participation: Success hinges on everyone contributing. If some peers slack off, the group suffers.
-
Time-Intensive: Collaborative learning can be slower than direct instruction, as discussions and consensus-building take effort.
-
Conflict Risk: Differences in personality, work ethic, or opinions can lead to friction, derailing the process.
-
Limited Depth: Complex topics might not be explored fully without an expert to guide deeper inquiry.
Copyright ©2025 askatechteacher.com – All rights reserved.
Here’s the sign-up link if the image above doesn’t work:
Jacqui Murray has been teaching K-18 technology for 30 years. She is the editor/author of over a hundred tech ed resources including a K-12 technology curriculum, K-8 keyboard curriculum, K-8 Digital Citizenship curriculum. She is an adjunct professor in tech ed, Master Teacher, webmaster for four blogs, CSTA presentation reviewer, freelance journalist on tech ed topics, contributor to NEA Today, and author of the tech thrillers, To Hunt a Sub and Twenty-four Days. You can find her resources at Structured Learning.
Peer Feedback That Works
Assessing student learning traditionally is accomplished with tests. The problem teachers have with this approach is managing them. If they’re short answer or essay — the preferred way to check understanding — grading takes a long time. And unless assessments are frequent, it’s easy to miss the student who is lost or just doesn’t get it. Even with the advances technology offers in responding directly to students, it can be too time-consuming for large classes.
A solution that has become popular is peer feedback. This isn’t new; in fact, it is prevalent in universities. What exactly is peer feedback and how is it being applied to lower grades?
What is peer feedback?
When used as an assessment strategy, peer feedback is much more than casual comments shared between classmates. It is the logical evaluation of one student’s work by another using predetermined characteristics and measures. Through the implementation of a prescribed rubric, a student’s classmate looks at their work and determines if it satisfies the goals of the lesson, the Essential Questions, and the Big Ideas.
One important difference from teacher evaluations is that students don’t grade each other.
Why peer feedback?
Peer feedback has become popular as teachers move to a “teacher-guide” model of education rather than a “teacher-lecturer”. When the time comes in a lesson to assess student learning, instead of a formal test in a quiet room with a clock ticking, teachers employ a system of peer feedback. For many, this is more effective, less stressful, and maintains the goal of encouraging lifelong learners. Sometimes, this is an excellent way to address school budget cuts, large classes, and the burden of too many pieces to be graded. Other times, teachers employ this method because not only the one being reviewed benefits but so too does the reviewer as they must know what the lesson is about to effectively review classmates. As a pedagogical strategy, it teaches critical thinking, one of those traits that is hard to teach but essential to being a productive adult.
